MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W650563720 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511498664

The New Hegelians: Politics and Philosophy in the Hegelian School

2006· book· en· W650563720 on OpenAlexaff
Douglas Moggach

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCritical Theory and Philosophy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHegelianismEmancipationPhilosophyPoliticsMarxist philosophyPolitical philosophyMaterialismState (computer science)ModernityHumanitiesReligious studiesEpistemologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Hegelianism, republicanism, and modernity Douglas Moggach 1. Eduard Gans on poverty and on the constitutional debate Norbert Waszek 2. Ludwig Feuerbach's Critique of Religion and the end of moral philosophy Howard Williams 3. The symbolic dimension and the politics of Left Hegelianism Warren Breckman 4. Exclusiveness and political universalism in Bruno Bauer Massimiliano Tomba (translated from Italian by Douglas Moggach) 5. Republican rigorism and emancipation in Bruno Bauer Douglas Moggach 6. Edgar Bauer and The Origins of the Theory of Terrorism Eric v.d. Luft 7. Ein Menschenleben: Hegel and Stirner Lawrence S. Stepelevich 8. 'The State and I': Max Stirner's anarchism David Leopold 9. Engels and the invention of the catastrophist conception of the industrial revolution Gareth Stedman Jones 10. The basis of the state in the Marx of 1842 Andrew Chitty 11. Marx and Feuerbachian essence: returning to the question of 'Human Essence' in historical materialism Jose Crisostomo de Souza 12. Freedom and the 'Realm of Necessity' Sean Sayers 13. Work, language and community: a response to Hegel's critics Ardis B. Collins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.023
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCritical Theory and PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207