Daily Flight, Feeding and Calling Activities of Four Plusiine Moths, Autographa nigrisigna, Thyanoplusia intermixta, Ctenoplusia agnata and Chrysodeixis eriosoma (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In general, plusiine moths actively begin flying from dusk and feeding and calling activities have been clearly discussed in many reports. We examined daily behaviors, specifically, flight, feeding and calling activities of the plusiine moths, Autographa nigrisigna, Thysanoplusia intermixta, Ctenoplusia agnata and Chrysodeixis eriosoma, which are major pests of various commercial crops in the Kanto region of Japan. Daily flight activities were tested with an actograph system in the laboratory. The insects showed pronounced flight activity soon after the lights were turned off, during darkness and after the lights were turned on. Of specific interest is that during darkness, C. eriosoma showed high flight activity earlier than the other three species. We also observed daily feeding and calling activities, and found these two activities were synchronized with flight activity. We conclude that patterns of calling and associated flights are not the same for all plusiine species although most adults of the Plusiinae fly actively during darkness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".