MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W651504980

Carbon Footprint of Freight Traffic and Pavement Treatments for Interprovincial Trade Flows of Atlantic Canada (Poster)

2014· article· fr· W651504980 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shohel Amin, LE Amador-Jiménez

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation 2014: Past, Present, Future - 2014 Conference and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada // Transport 2014 : Du passé vers l'avenir - 2014 Congrès et Exposition de 'Association des transports du Canada · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbon footprintEnvironmental scienceGreenhouse gasFuel efficiencyFootprintTruckCarbon dioxideTransport engineeringEnvironmental engineeringEngineeringGeographyGeologyAutomotive engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Freight movement emits GHGs and undermines pavement - adding additional emissions from pavement maintenance & rehabilitation (M&R) treatments. This study predicts the carbon footprint of freight movement and pavement maintenance on regional highways of Atlantic provinces of Canada. Integration of environmental analysis within a spatial input-output model estimates equivalent single axle loads (ESALs) and CO2 emissions on regional highways for a 30 years period. ESALs combined with observed pavement strength, result in the generation of pavement deterioration curves. The curves are used for performance-based optimization to estimate necessary pavement maintenance operations. A total 1.279 million tons of CO2 and 1.403 – 1.755 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent GHGs will emit from predicted fuel consumption and pavement surface treatments during 2012-2041.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation 2014: Past, Present, Future - 2014 Conference and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada // Transport 2014 : Du passé vers l'avenir - 2014 Congrès et Exposition de 'Association des transports du Canada→Same topicEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability→French-language works237,207→