MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W65214560 · doi:10.1177/159101990100700204

Importance of the over the Wire Occlusion Balloon Catheter Designed for Intracranial Use

2001· article· en· W65214560 on OpenAlexaff
Alain Weill, Thomas R. Marotta, Gary Redekop

Bibliographic record

VenueInterventional Neuroradiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsVancouver General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterventional neuroradiologyPerforationNeuroradiologyOcclusionCatheterBalloonRadiologyInterventional radiologyBalloon catheterSurgeryNeurology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY: The over the wire occlusion balloon catheter is a new interventional neuroradiology tool. We present two cases where this system was crucial for the management. In the first case it allowed us to perform an occlusion test before closing in safe conditions a M2 fusiform aneurysm. In the second case, it allowed us to control a subarachnoid bleeding after endovascular perforation of a normal left P1 segment. We believe that all interventional neuroradiologists should be familiar and comfortable with the systems available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterventional NeuroradiologySame topicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesFrench-language works237,207