MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W652867606

Delivering Olympic and elite sport in a cross cultural context : from Beijing to London

2015· book· en· W652867606 on OpenAlex
Fan Hong, Lu Zhouxiang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRoutledge eBooks · 2015
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSport and Mega-Event Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeijingEliteChinaCeremonyContext (archaeology)RecreationParadePolitical scienceOpening ceremonyMedia studiesHistorySociologyPoliticsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acknowledgements Fan Hong and Lu Zhouxiang 1. The Olympics and Elite Sport Policy: Where Will It All End? Barrie Houlihan and Jinming Zheng 2. Athlete Development, Athlete Rights and Athlete Welfare: A European Union Perspective Ian Henry 3. A Study of the Relationship Between Elite Athletes' Educational Development and Sporting Performance Dawn Aquilina 4. Shining a Spotlight on Public Diplomacy: Chinese Media Coverage on the Opening Ceremony of the 2012 London Olympics Xin Zhong, Shuhua Zhou, Bin Shen and Chao Huang 5. The Legacy: Did the Beijing Olympic Games have a Long-Term Impact on Grassroots Sport Participation in Chinese Townships? Jing Feng and Fan Hong 6. From Hongkew Recreation Ground to Bird's Nest: The Past, Present and Future of Large Sports Venues in China Lu Zhouxiang 7. The Chinese Olympic Dream and the Beijing Olympic Legacies Shiming Luo and Fuhua Huang

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it