Facilitating Cold Climate Pavement Drainage Using Geosynthetics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Good highway drainage has been recognized for many centuries. The theoretical concepts are simple and the technology applicable to highways built today (1999) is widely available in the technical literature. It is widely understood that efficient drainage is essential to good highway performance independent of aggregate compacted density or aggregate stability. While the theoretical concepts are simple they are often not effective in cold climates. Indeed, for cold climates, these simple concepts are shown by field excavations described herein to be lacking in a number of aspects. Based on field excavations and performance of some selected Ontario highway locations, involving both clay and sand subgrades, recommendations are presented for the design detailing, selection and installation of geosynthetic edge drains. Installation at the investigated sites was by various techniques that included: ploughed-in-place, trench excavation, and mechanical trencher and boot. All excavated edge drains were installed as retrofits either at the time of the original pavement construction or several years later. The retrofits used the existing excavated/displaced shoulder granular material as backfill. Frost action, despite what was considered good drainage practice at the time of installation, is shown to have had a major effect on field performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".