MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W653912109

Cities and visitors : regulating people, markets, and city space

2003· book· en· W653912109 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lily M. Hoffman, Susan S. Fainstein, Dennis R. Judd

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismGarciaHospitalitySociologyHumanitiesArt historyEconomyGeographyArtEconomicsArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

List of Illustrations vii List of Tables ix List of Contributors xi Series Editorsa Preface xv Preface xvi Introduction 1 Susan S. Fainstein, Lily M. Hoffman, and Dennis R. Judd Part I: Regulating Visitors 21 1 Visitors and the Spatial Ecology of the City Dennis R. Judd 23 2 Cities, Security, and Visitors: Managing Mega--Events in France Sophie Body--Gendrot 39 3 Sociological Theories of Tourism and Regulation Theory Nicolo Costa and Guido Martinotti 53 Part II: Regulating City Space 73 4 Amsterdam: It's All in the Mix Pieter Terhorst, Jacques van de Ven, and Leon Deben 75 5 Revalorizing the Inner City: Tourism and Regulation in Harlem Lily M. Hoffman 91 6 Barcelona: Governing Coalitions, Visitors, and the Changing City Center Marisol Garcia and Nuria Claver 113 7 The Evolution of Australian Tourism Urbanization Patrick Mullins 126 Part III: Regulating Labor Markets 143 8 Regulating Hospitality: Tourism Workers in New York and Los Angeles David L. Gladstone and Susan S. Fainstein 145 9 Shaping the Tourism Labor Market in Montreal Marc V. Levine 167 Part IV: Regulating the Tourism Industry 185 10 Mexico: Tensions in the Fordist Model of Tourism Development Daniel Hiernaux--Nicolas 187 11 The New Berlin: Marketing the City of Dreams Hartmut Haussermann and Claire Colomb 200 12 Museums as Flagships of Urban Development Chris Hamnett and Noam Shoval 219 Part V: Conclusion 237 13 Making Theoretical Sense of Tourism Susan S. Fainstein, Lily M. Hoffman, and Dennis R. Judd 239 Index 254

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations102
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchFrench-language works237,207