COPYRIGHT ANDFREESPEECH COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL ANALYSES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Preface 1. Introduction PART A: MAPPING THE CONFLICT 2. Copyright and free speech theory 3. Commodification and cultural ownership 4. Copyright norms and the problem of private censorship 5. Towards an international public interest rule? Human rights and international copyright law PART B: NATIONAL PERSPECTIVES 6. Copyright and the First Amendment 7. Copyright, the public interest and freedom of speech 8. The impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on United Kingdom copyright law 9. Not such a 'timid thing' - the UK's integrity right and freedom of expression 10. Canadian copyright law and its Charters 11. Copyright and freedom of political communication in Australia 12. Freedom of expression and copyright under the civil law 13. Copyright and free speech in transition: the Russian experience PART C: THE DIGITAL WORLD 14. First Amendment speech and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act: a proper marriage 15. Contracting out of copyright in the Information Society - the impact on freedom of expression 16. Databases, the Human Rights Act and EU law
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.015 | 0.027 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.081 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".