ACTUALISATION TRANSCENDANTE ET ACTIVITÉS SPIRITUELLES/RELIGIEUSES CHEZ LES PERSONNES ÂGÉES DE PLUS DE 60 ANS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La presente recherche vise a explorer s'il existe un lien entre le niveau d'actualisation transcendante (psychospirituelle) et le niveau d'activites spirituelles/religieuses (pratique et frequence), ainsi qu'a identifier les differences et les ressemblances des types de pratique selon le mode d'actualisation. Les participants ont ete recrutes a partir d'un sous-echantillon, compose de 290 personnes âgees de plus de 60 ans, de l'Etude longitudinale quebecoise sur le vieillissement (ELQUEV). Le Profil d'Actualisation Transcendante (PAT), la Mesure de l'actualisation specifique (MAS) et plusieurs instruments servant a evaluer les caracteristiques des participants et les indices de sante physique et mentale ont ete utilises aux fins de cette etude. Les resultats demontrent, entre autres, que le nombre d'individus pratiquant chacune des activites spirituelles et religieuses est proportionnellement plus eleve chez les personnes s'actualisant dans la transcendance et que ces dernieres entreprennent aussi un plus grand nombre d'activites differentes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".