MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W65505258

Assessment of Ubiquitous Healthcare Information Systems Benefits

2010· article· en· W65505258 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Reza Montazemi, Jeff J. Pittaway, Hamed Qahri‐Saremi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Association for Information Systems · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careUbiquitous computingContext (archaeology)Computer scienceInformation systemDecision support systemOrder (exchange)Healthcare systemRisk analysis (engineering)Knowledge managementHuman–computer interactionBusinessEngineeringData mining
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Health is a fully individualized concern, and is therefore inherently mobile. Thus, Ubiquitous Healthcare Information Systems can enable a much-needed patient-centered care environment. This paper presents a decision support system that makes use of system dynamics methodologies in order to assess the improved health benefits that may be realized within the context of ubiquitous healthcare information systems in support of managing diabetes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.733

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.008
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Association for Information SystemsSame topicContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207