Транснациональная организованная преступность как угроза безопасности государств участников Содружества Независимых государств: некоторые проблемы теории и практики
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, we tried to examine some problems in the theory and practice of countering transnational organized crime as a threat to the security of states - members of the Commonwealth of Independent States. Despite some attempts to describe transnational crime, until recently established comprehensive characteristics of the phenomenon. In modern research scientists mainly polemic about the notion of transnational organized crime. A unified approach to understanding the essence of transnational organized crime will enable States - members of the Commonwealth of Independent States is more productive to respond to this negative phenomenon, which in turn have a positive impact on the security of states. subject of study in this article was the transnational organized crime as a threat to the security of states – members of the Commonwealth of Independent States. study, based on the provisions of the dialectical materialist theory of knowledge of reality, the systems approach, relying on general scientific knowledge and methods allowed to form the following conclusions:(i) organized crime is the functioning of the criminal groups of varying degrees of organization, consisting of citizens of two or more states or stateless persons are characterized by complex forms of organized criminal activities carried out with the use of transnational connections and consists in propagating the territory of two or more states planning commission or the consequences of committing criminal acts in order to obtain economic benefits, as well as the creation of conditions which give even greater profits.(ii) main ways of functioning and protection of criminal groups from social control are corruption, violence, use of significant differences in the criminal justice systems of various countries.(iii) Signs of transnational organized crime: (a) the presence of criminal groups of varying degrees of organization, including the citizens of two or more states or stateless persons; (b) dissemination, planning, committing or consequences of criminal activity on the territory of two or more states; (c) extensive use of transnational connections in organized criminal activity; (d) manifestation of criminal activities as illegal and in legal spheres; (e) the use of corrupt or violent mechanisms for achieving the goals; (f) the use of differences of criminal justice systems of foreign countries for the promotion of conditions to ensure criminal activity and others. transnational organized crime; crime; criminal activity; state security Beare M.E., ed. Critical Reflections on Organized Money Laundering, and Corruption. Toronto, Buffalo, and London: University of Toronto Press, 2003. Dolgova A.I. in Russia at the Beginning of the 21st Century and Responding to It. Moscow: Russian Criminological Association Publisher, 2004. (In Russian). Edwards A., Gill P. Crime as Enterprise? – Case of Transnational Crime''. Law and Social Change 37.3 (2002): 203–223. Finckenauer J.O. Russian Organized and Human Trafficking. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001. Godunov I.V. Organized in Russia, Ways and Forms of Counteraction. Doctoral diss. Ryazan, 2002. (In Russian). Holmes L. Crime, and Corruption in Post-Communist Europe and the CIS. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 42.2 (2009): 265–287. Ivanov E.A. Money Laundering and Regulation to Combat It. Moscow: Russian Publishing House Publisher, 1999. (In Russian). Jamieson A. Transnational Organized Crime: A European Perspective.Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 24.5 (2001): 377–387. Krasinsky V.V. Organized in the Elections and in the Russian Government. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publisher, 2014. (In Russian). Le V. Organised Typologies: Structure, Activities and Conditions. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 1 (2012): 121–131. Mallory S.L. Understanding Organized Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2011. Nomokonov V.A. Organized Crime: Definitions and Reality. Vladivostok: Far Eastern University Publisher. 2001. (In Russian). Paraschiv G. Conceptualizing Organized Crime. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets 2 (2013): 173–178. Reichel P., Albanese J., eds. Organized Crime: An Overview from Six Continents. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2014. Repetsky A.L. Organized Doctoral diss. Irkutsk, 2001. (In Russian). Shcheblykina I.V. Transnational organized crime in the border sphere of the Russian Federation in the context of globalization of Crime. Scientific Bases of Criminal Law and Globalization Processes. Proceedings of 5th Congress of the Russian Criminal Law (27–28 May 2010, Moscow). Moscow: Moscow University Publisher, 2010, pp. 593–594. (In Russian). Shcheblykina I.V. Transnational Organized of Cross-Border Nature and Criminological Situation in the Border Area of Russia. Improving the Fight against Organized Corruption and Extremism. Ed. A.I. Dolgova. Moscow: Russian Criminological Association Publisher, 2008, pp. 91–101. (In Russian). Small K., Taylor B. State and Local Law Enforcement Response to Crime. Trends in Organized Crime 10.2 (2006): 5–17. Sukharenko A.N. Transnational Aspects of Russian Organized Crime. Organized Terrorism, Corruption in Their Manifestations and Their Control. Moscow: Russian Criminological Association Publisher, 2005, pp. 35–49. (In Russian). Transnational. Great Dictionary of the Russian Language. St. Petersburg: Rossiyskaya entsiklopediya Publisher, 2000, p. 1339. (In Russian). UN Convention against Organized dated 15 Nov. 2000. Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation 40 (2004): 3882. (In Russian). Vlassis D. The UN Convention Against Organized Crime.Transnational Organized and international Security: Business as Usual. Boulder and London: Lynne Reiner, 2002, pp. 83–94. Von Lampe K. Transnational Organized Challenges for Future Research. Crime, Law and Social Change 58.2 (2012): 179–194. Voronin Yu.A. Organized Yekaterinburg, 1997. (In Russian). Williams P. Transnational Organized and the State. Cambridge Studies in International Relations 85 (2002): 161–182. Zvyagintsev V.V. Legal Regulation of Combating Organized on the Border of the Russian Federation. National Security, Business. Ed. A.I. Dolgova. Moscow: Russian Criminological Association Publisher, 2012, pp. 321–322. (In Russian). Zvyagintsev V.V. On the Definition of Organized Crime. Belarusian Political Analyst: Diversity in Unity. Proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific-Practical Conference, Grodno, 22–23 May 2008. Grodno: Grodno University Publisher, 2008, pp. 162–165. (In Russian). Shcheblykina, I. V., and V. V. Zvyagintsev. Transnational Organized as a Threat for the Security of States – Members of the Commonwealth of Independent States: Some Problems of Theory and Practice. Space and Time 4 (2014): 249–254. (In Russian). Fixed network address 2226-7271provr_st4-18.2014.121.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".