MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W656016285

New histories for old : changing perspectives on Canada's native pasts

2007· book· en· W656016285 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Susan Neylan, Theodore Binnema

Bibliographic record

VenueUBC Press eBooks · 2007
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetisFrontierTreatyMillerAppropriationGold rushCovenantColonialismAotearoaHistoryArt historyArchaeologyGeographyGenealogyLawPolitical sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maps Introduction / Ted Binnema and Susan Neylan 1 Arthur J. Ray and the Writing of Aboriginal History / Ted Binnema and Susan Neylan 2 Rupert's Land, Nituskeenan, Our Land: Cree and English Naming and Claiming around the Dirty Sea / Jennifer S.H. Brown 3 Echo of the Crane: Tracing Anishnawbek and Metis Title to Bawating (Sault Ste. Marie) / Victor P. Lytwyn 4 Compact, Contract, Covenant: The Evolution of Indian Treaty Making / J.R. Miller 5 Smallpox along the Frontier of the Plains Borderlands at the Turn of the Twentieth Century / Jody Decker 6 Mapping the New El Dorado: The Fraser River Gold Rush and the Appropriation of Native Space / Daniel Marshall 7 Innovation, Tradition, Colonialism, and Aboriginal Fishing Conflicts in the Lower Fraser Canyon / Keith Thor Carlson 8 Meanings of Mobility on the Northwest Coast / Paige Raibmon 9 Choose Your Flag: Perspectives on the Tsimshian Migration from Metlakatla, British Columbia, to New Metlakatla, Alaska, 1887 / Susan Neylan 10 Gitxsan Law and Settler Disorder: The Skeena Uprising of 1888 / R.M. Galois 11 Arthur J. Ray and the Empirical Opportunity / Cole Harris Contributors Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.803

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.010
Science and technology studies0.0420.015
Scholarly communication0.0170.006
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUBC Press eBooksSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207