MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W656093182 · doi:10.14217/9781848591288-en

Gender, Peace and Security: Women's Advocacy and Conflict Resolution

2012· book· en· W656093182 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Education, and Development Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommonwealthSierra leonePolitical sciencePeacekeepingEconomic growthCapacity buildingPublic administrationDevelopment economicsSocioeconomicsSociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Foreword Abbreviations and acronyms 1. Introduction 2. Women, Conflict and UNSCR 1325 The role of women in conflict and post-conflict countries UNSCR 1325: In support of women in peace-building processes 3. Women's Peace-building Efforts across the Commonwealth Examples of limited engagement in peace negotiations Sierra Leone Mozambique Zimbabwe Solomon Islands Papua New Guinea (Bougainville) Why women's engagement may be limited following conflict 4. Women and National Action Plans (NAPs) Women's involvement in the adoption of NAPs Rwanda Sierra Leone Uganda NAPs in countries at peace: a different experience United Kingdom Canada Benefits of NAPS 5. Peace and Conflict in the Commonwealth Implementation of UNSCR 1325 in selected countries (2000-2011) India Nigeria Papua New Guinea (Bougainville) Rwanda Solomon Islands Sri Lanka Uganda Afghanistan (a non-Commonwealth example) Possible scenarios for women, peace and conflict in these countries, 2011-2015 India Nigeria Papua New Guinea (Bougainville) Rwanda Solomon Islands Sri Lanka Uganda Afghanistan (a non-Commonwealth example) 6. Recommendations Recommendations for the Commonwealth Secretariat and other strategic partners Address cultural beliefs Address structural inequalities: economic opportunities Address structural inequalities: laws Address monitoring and evaluation Develop a Commonwealth model for the adoption of NAPs Collaborate with other local and international actors Support women's inclusion in peace processes Work with countries at peace to prevent conflict and engender peacekeeping Recommendations for Commonwealth member states Document lessons learned and best practices Take a multi-sectoral approach to the adoption of NAPs Collaborate with the private sector and civil society organisations Align reporting of NAPs with the Commonwealth Gender Plan of Action Domesticate NAPs into national laws Dedicate funds for the implementation of NAPs Introduce accountability measures for NAPs References Annex. United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it