Reform and development of private international law : essays in honour of Sir Peter North
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction 1. The Brussels Convention Becomes a Regulation: Implications for Legal Basis, External Competence, and Contract Jurisdiction 2. Reform of Private International Law by Judges: Canada as a Case Study 3. Forum Selection and Forum Rejection in US Courts: One Rationale for a Global Choice of Court Convention 4. Comity in Modern Private International Law 5. The EU and a Metamorphosis of Private International Law 6. Special Rules of Private International Law for Special Cases: What should we do about Intellectual Property? 7. A Culling of Sacred Cows: The Impact of the EC Insolvency Regulation on English Conflict of Laws 8. The Trust in Private International Law 9. Matrimonial (Marital) Property Rights in Conflict of Laws: A Reconsideration 10. On Some Writers on the Conflict of Laws of Contracts 11. The Hague Conference's Judgments Project 12. Making English Private International Law 13. Declining Jurisdiction under the Brussels I Regulation 2001 and the Preliminary Draft Hague Judgments Convention: A Comparison 14. National Private International Law and International Instruments
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".