MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W658105193 · doi:10.1299/jsmelem.2003.645

403 Temperature Predictions in Machining

2003· article· en· W658105193 on OpenAlexafffund
İsmail Lazoğlu, Kivilcim Buyukhatipoglu, Yusuf Altıntaş

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of International Conference on Leading Edge Manufacturing in 21st century LEM21 · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGeneral Motors of Canada
KeywordsMachiningRakeChipChip formationMechanical engineeringTransient (computer programming)Heat transferMaterials scienceRake angleSteady state (chemistry)Energy balanceMechanicsTool wearEngineeringComputer sciencePhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a numerical model based on the finite difference method is presented to predict tool and chip temperature fields in continuous machining and time varying milling processes. Machining operations are studied by modeling the heat transfer between the tool and chip at the tool rake face contact zone. The shear energy created in the primary zone, the friction energy produced at the rake face-chip contact zone and the heat balance between the moving chip and stationary tool are considered. The temperature distribution is solved using finite difference method. The model is also extended to milling where the cutting is interrupted and the chip thickness varies with time. The proposed model models combines the steady-state temperature prediction in continuous machining and the transient temperature evaluation in interrupted cutting operations. The mathematical models and simulation results are in satisfactory agreement with experimental temperature measurements reported in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of International Conference on Leading Edge Manufacturing in 21st century LEM21Same topicAdvanced machining processes and optimizationFrench-language works237,207