Upgrading the Belhar Stormwater System to Combat Pollution of the Kuils River
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A review of the stormwater system in the residential suburb of Belhar, Cape Town (South Africa) concluded that an existing retention pond was oversized.In addition, discharged runoff was increasing the levels of pollutants and litter in the Kuils River.Remedial options were considered, inter alia an evaluation of a wet pond and a dry pond as management tools.Important factors included both water quantity (flow rates and volumes) and water quality (especially particulates).SWMM (USEPA Storm Water Management Model) was used to simulate the hydrology of the Belhar catchment, and the hydraulics of the storm water network.The analysis included typical rainfall event-based modeling of ponds and their overflow structures, and a first-order water quality study.The results of the analysis prompted the selection of a dry pond as a pollution-and flood-mitigating measure.These results also led to an existing pond being partially filled in to allow for housing and commercial use.Ortell, Z. 2004."Upgrading the Belhar Stormwater System to Combat Pollution of the Kuils River."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".