El santo ateo: Parodia religiosa en Tantas veces Pedro
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En su novela Tantas veces Pedro, el autor peruano Alfredo Bryce Echenique utiliza las herramientas de la metaficción para hacer una parodia del género hagiográfico y de la Biblia, así burlándose de la religión católica. Para probar esta tesis, este trabajo combina las teorías de metaficción y parodia establecidas por la teórica Linda Hutcheon con el concepto de una hagiografía o “vida de santo”. Además de esta combinación, se explora la historia de la literatura peruana, en particular su larga tradición hagiográfica. Al juntar estas ideas, se puede ver cómo la obra de Bryce Echenique es una parodia humorística de escritura religiosa y, así, una crítica de la misma religión. In his novel Tantas veces Pedro, the Peruvian author Alfredo Bryce Echenique employs the tools of metafiction in order to parody the hagiographic genre and the Bible, thus mocking the Catholic religion. In order to prove this hypothesis, this work combines the theories of metafiction and parody established by theorist Linda Hutcheon with the concept of hagiography or “life of a saint”. Along with this combination, this work explores the history of Peruvian literature, paying particular attention to its long hagiographical tradition. By joining all these ideas, one can see how this work of Bryce Echenique’s is a humorous parody of religious writing and, thus, a mockery of the religion itself.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it