Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Over 30% of children with ADHD treated with a rigorous multimodal intervention in the MTA study did not reach full functional remission. New long-acting drugs have been developed with this treatment goal in mind. METHODS: Presentations at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry discussed the development of long-acting drugs for ADHD and clinical studies of their efficacy; these presentations are summarized below. RESULTS: Concerta(R) OROS-MPH releases methylphenidate (MPH) in an initial bolus, followed by increasing concentrations throughout the day. This pattern of drug delivery overcomes the development of acute tolerance; classroom analog studies have shown that ADHD symptoms and academic productivity are thereby maintained for 12 hours. A larger open-label study showed that efficacy was maintained through the 12-month study period. An 8-week open-label trial found that OROS-MPH produced significantly higher remission rates than immediate-release MPH (44% vs 16%; p = 0.0002), as well as significantly higher Clinical Global Impression and parent satisfaction scores. Adderall XR(R), an extended-release formulation of mixed amphetamine salts, has recently been withdrawn from the market. CONCLUSIONS: Long-acting stimulant formulations have dramatically changed the landscape of ADHD practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".