MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W66102027

"Tis Pity She's a Corpse: Modernism, Remembering, and Dismemberment in Valle-Inclán's Sonatas

2000· article· es· W66102027 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Leora Lev

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2000
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Literature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtDandyLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este art?culo, se explora en las Sonatas de Valle-Incl?n el bricolage supuestamente ir?nico de textos decimon?nicos g?ticos, simbolistas, decadentes, noirs y rom?nticos como alegor?a desconstructiva fracasada de la colonizaci?n europea de la cultura espa?ola ejemplificada en una espa?olidad feminizada y reificada. Este carnaval de transgresiones intertextuales pretende subvertir las ideolog?as burguesas pol?ticas y sociales que afirman un yo civilizado, masculino y europeo frente a un otro sexual, ?tnico y geogr?fico. Una Espa?a feminizada como Carmen ex?tica y salvaje por el viajero dandy franc?s y el gusto baudelaireano a la prostituta caribe?a son algunos de los fetiches supuestamente parodiados aqu?. Sin embargo, la parodia valleinclanesca termina por desconstruirse en lo que se refiere a los nexos formados entre la representaci?n del deseo transgresivo, el cuerpo femenino y el paisaje ex?tico/extra?o. En vez de reconfigurar y desafiar radicalmente las oposiciones epistemol?gicas a trav?s de las cuales la figura donjuanesca, dandy sat?nico, realiza sus fetiches imperialistas, narcisistas y masculinistas, ?stos quedan re-inscritos textualmente en las Sonatas. Esta desconstrucci?n ambivalente y fracasada refleja una ansiedad cultural que remite tanto al cuerpo nacional y social en crisis finisecular, como a la potencia del cuerpo sexual masculino.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Canadiense de Estudios HispánicosSame topicSpanish Literature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207