Near-infrared spectroscopy: validation of bladder-outlet obstruction assessment using non-invasive parameters.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a non-invasive optical technique able to monitor changes in the concentration of oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin in the bladder detrusor during bladder filling and emptying. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of a new NIRS instrument and algorithm to classify male patients with LUTS as obstructed or unobstructed based on comparison with classification via conventional invasive urodynamics (UDS). METHOD: Male patients with LUTS were recruited and underwent uroflow and urodynamic pressure flow studies with simultaneous transcutaneous NIRS monitoring following measurement of post residual volume (PVR) via ultrasound. Data analysis first classified each subject as obstructed or unobstructed using the standard pressure flow data and nomogram, then compared these results with a classification derived via a customized algorithm which analyzed the pattern of change of the NIRS data plus measurements of PVR and Qmax. RESULTS: Seventy subjects enrolled: 57 data sets had all required parameters [13 incomplete sets due to: communication error between NIRS and urodynamics instruments (9); data saving error (1); damaged fiber optic cables (3)]. Two complete data sets were excluded [subjects with hematuria (2)]. Thus data from 55 subjects was analyzed. The NIRS algorithm correctly identified those diagnosed as obstructed by conventional urodynamic classification in 24 of 28 subjects (sensitivity = 85.71%) and, and those diagnosed as unobstructed in 24 of 27 subjects (specificity = 88.89%). CONCLUSION: Scores derived from NIRS data plus PVR and Qmax are able to correctly identify > 85% of subjects classified as obstructed using UDS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it