MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W67392201

Characteristics of confined square jets in the vicinity of a free surface.

2005· article· en· W67392201 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Girish Sankar

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic flow and structures
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSquare (algebra)Surface (topology)Free surfacePhysicsGeologyGeometryMechanicsMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The results of an experimental investigation of a turbulent jet flow issuing from a square nozzle in the vicinity of a free surface are presented. Experiments were conducted using a two-dimensional laser Doppler anemometer and a particle image velocimeter. The focus of this study was the near region of the jet (X/B < 30). Here, B refers to the nozzle width and X is the distance from the nozzle exit. LDA measurements were conducted at eight stations downstream of the nozzle exit along the centerline of the jet. Four tailwater depths were used in this study. Additional measurements were also conducted to identify axis switching and to this end measurements were obtained at various transverse locations. PIV measurements were conducted in the near jet region (X/B < 3) corresponding to a tailwater depth of 2.5B. A good comprehension of the fluid dynamics of a square jet expanding in the vicinity of the free surface is achieved. Higher order moments were calculated to provide information on the coherent structures and study the role of velocity fluctuations. Two local peaks on either side of the jet centerline is observed. The difference in magnitudes of the peaks indicate differences in the prevailing entrainment characteristics on the top and bottom portions of the jet. Through the quadrant analysis, sweep and ejection type events were observed. To better understand these events, four kinds of eddies are classified for simplicity and their behavior is discussed.* (Abstract shortened by UMI.) *This dissertation is a compound document (contains both a paper copy and a CD as part of the dissertation). The CD requires the following system requirements: Microsoft Office.Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Paper copy at Leddy Library: Theses & Major Papers - Basement, West Bldg. / Call Number: Thesis2005 .S26. Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 44-03, page: 1441. Thesis (M.A.Sc.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 2005.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)Same topicHydraulic flow and structuresFrench-language works237,207