The Significance of the 1991 Ordo Celebrandi Matrimonium for the Canon Law of Marriage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quelques nouvelles lois importantes regissant la preparation et la celebration de mariage ont ete presentees dans la deuxieme edition du Rituel du mariage-l'editio typica altera de l'Ordo celebrandi Matrimonium (=OCM) qui a ete publie en latin en 1991 et en francais en 2005. En plus de la presentation d'un nouveau rite de mariage devant un assistant qualifie laic (pas dans l'edition francaise), la deuxieme edition de l'OCM de 1991 marque une expansion majeure des lois liturgiques par rapport a celles de l'editio typica de 1969. Alors que certaines de ces lois repetent celles de l'edition precedente et du Code, plusieurs autres sont nouvelles et, en somme, representent une addition importante au ius vigens sur le mariage. L'objet de cette etude concerne les normes disciplinaires qui sont nouvelles dans l'OCMde 1991, a l'exclusion des rubriques pour les quatre rites au moment de leur celebration meme. La premiere partie de l'etude examine les normes disciplinaires gouvernant chacun des quatre rites differents du mariage. La deuxieme partie considere d'autres nouvelles normes disciplinaires communes aux quatre rites se rapportant tant a la preparation pour le mariage qu'a sa celebration liturgique. Parmi les conclusions de l'A., on trouve que l'esprit du legislateur a evolue a propos de la nature de l'acte d'assistance au mariage par un laic. Cette assistance ne devrait pas etre consideree comme une exception a la forme canonique, comme qu'indique au c. 1108, § 1, mais comme ayant exactement la meme nature juridique et les memes effets que l'acte d'assistance par un clerc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".