La representation de l'infidelite dans le nouvel ordre amoureux : une etude de sept romans quebecois contemporains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Love, a universal topic present throughout all times, still preoccupies men and women. The intense effect clearly is a part, may be just a parcel, of our own being. Many words have been spoken and written about love, and in the times of consecutive and numerous relationships, they deal with both fidelity and its counterpart, infidelity. In this thesis, We analyze and study infidelity in seven novels published between 1995 and 2005 by incorporating theories of feminism, psychoanalysis and socio-criticism. While choosing my corpus, We also considered various generations. We wanted to portray infidelity in a way that would allow to compare infidelity in terms of genre and from the perspectives of writers who personally witnessed the turmoil initiated by the feminism of the 1970s. The corpus is composed of novels written by female and male authors. We choose the following books: Folle (2004, Nelly Arcan), Scrapbook (2004, Nadine Bismuth), La Gloire de Cassiodore (2002, Monique LaRue), Marie-Hélène au mois de mars (1998, Maxime-Olivier Moutier), Le Milieu du jour (1995, Yvon Rivard), Carnets de naufrage (2000, Guillaume Vigneault) and Chercher le vent (2001, Guillaume Vigneault). The study of infidelity through a mixed corpus shows that in the realm of privacy, particularly in the situation of adultery, the judgment of women and the one that comes from the women - reflecting on the subject - is more severe, even relentless as it would be for the adulterous men. Feminism, the over-exploitation of sexuality in the media, and generalized individualism are some of the elements that influence the conception of the love relationship in today's Quebec society and that I will examine in this thesis
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".