Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'A. explore les differences entre le CIC et le CCEO dans leur description de la nature fondamentale du mariage et en donne une explication en situant son etude dans le contexte historique et theologique d'une diversite de pensee entre l'Occident et l'Orient. Les textes des deux Codes sont analyses et critiques a la lumiere de l'histoire et de Vatican II. En comparant les canons pertinents des deux legislations, l'A. demontre comment l'«alliance» matrimoniale est presentee differemment dans le Code oriental et dans le Code latin, lequel utilise aussi une methode tres distinctive par l'emploi du terme «contrat». Les diverses approches dans les deux descriptions de la sacramentalite du mariage chretien sont examinees et, en dernier, l'article observe les divergences des Codes dans la determination de ce qui precisement constitue un mariage: la loi latine est explicite, alors que la legislation orientale ne se prononce pas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".