Development of Quality of Life by Application Sufficiency Economy and Ottawa Charter Case Study: Kukot Sub-district, Lamlukka District, Pathumtani Province
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objectives of the Participatory Action Research (PAR) were focused on assessing quality of life ofthe citizenry, identifying factors affecting their quality of life and the best approach to its overall improvementthrough principle of Sufficiency Economy and Ottawa Charter. Purposive-sampling area was selected, withsampling group comprising a community leader and other interested community members. Data was compiledfrom three focused group discussions. Stage was then set for identification, analysis and prioritization of still-existing problems and unfulfilled needs of the community. Workshop was organized to devise and write out aplan of action, implement it and evaluate results through content analysis of the data. Results, the quality of life in the community under study was less than truly good, possibly because offailed expectations in utility services and interrelationships among community members. Nonetheless, thecommunity was developing. Factors affecting their quality of life included sense of camaraderie, companionshipof a pet, playgrounds, environment and stress. As for improving their quality of life by means of SufficiencyEconomy and Ottawa Charter, the community started program of recreational sports, which helped forge bondsof community friendship, preventing them from drugs and toward better state of health and wellness. There wasreal hope for improved quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.030 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it