MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W67962009

Changing protocols surrounding euthanasia.

2003· article· en· W67962009 on OpenAlexaff
John Tait

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHuman-Animal Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphGuelph General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpathyClosure (psychology)PsychologyEvent (particle physics)AnxietyService (business)Animal welfareSocial psychologyMedicineBusinessPsychiatryLawPolitical scienceMarketing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An unwritten rule has existed among veterinary practitioners for years that the 2 most important interactions clients will have with their veterinarian are their first visit, where they form their first impression of the veterinarian, and their last visit, which is often when euthanasia is performed. Whether the veterinarian travels to the client or the client to the veterinarian, euthanasia is an irreversible procedure for the animal and, most often, a very emotional time for the client, because of the sense of sudden loss, added to by the uncertainty around the event, which can be anxiety-inducing, frustrating, guilt ridden, and without closure, if not handled empathetically and in a timely fashion by the veterinarian. It has been determined that empathy is one of the top 5 qualities by which clients judge their service provider (1), and that conveyed empathy facilitates closure for the client. Nowhere is empathy more important for a client than during the stressful time of pet loss. As might be expected, many veterinarians are attracted into the profession in the first place for the very reason that they are extremely empathetic to animals and animal owners; therefore, acts of empathy come naturally. The bond between veterinarian and client is greatly augmented when reassurance and closure are reinforced for clients at 2 points in time: during the euthanasia procedure and as a follow-up after the client leaves the hospital (Cindy Adams, personal communication). Besides showing that empathy to clients during the procedure, veterinarians who more successfully strengthen the client-veterinarian bond are those who can convey that empathy to the clients after completion of the actual euthanasia by means of some sort of a follow-up approach. Why is the posteuthanasia follow-up message from the veterinarian important? Because, according to Dr. Adams, for clients, the follow-up item or message, in whatever form it presents itself, reinforces the closure and is symbolic of the process surrounding the death of their animal being completed, often controlled by the veterinarian through having the animal removed from the hospital and transported for cremation. Veterinarians typically manage the euthanasia experience well, through dedicated booking times, extended end-of-day appointments, posteuthanasia viewings, and premedication of patients and preplacement of catheters, etc. to facilitate noncomplicated euthanasias. Many veterinarians have adopted their own individual styles of follow-up that may include such steps as communication with clients through phone calls, sympathy cards and plaques, flowers, letters, etc. To assist veterinarians with their follow-up and clients with their closure, items of condolence are and have been available for a number of years. As much as a follow-up is important for the client and client-veterinarian bond, the timeliness of that follow-up is just as important. Clients who do not receive timely closure or for whom items, such as private cremation ashes, are not delivered when promised can quickly become angered during this sensitive time, thereby negating any goodwill for the hospital. Veterinary affiliated service providers responsible for performing cremations and removing cadavers from veterinary hospitals are recognizing that they can assist veterinarians and their grieving clients, and simultaneously enhance their own business, by providing follow-up services to both veterinarians and clients. One company that I know of has augmented the mechanical services of transportation and private or group cremations, which, traditionally, have been provided to veterinarians, with a number of innovative services and products. The founder of this company recognized a need for grieving pet owners when, much to his frustration, he waited a month for his deceased dog's ashes to be returned from a private cremation. Apart from providing the traditional cremation and 2-way transportation of cadavers and ashes, this company provides clients with a tastefully arranged facility where they can personally transport or visit their deceased pets (including horses) privately prior to their cremation, participate in the cremation process, retrieve items such as collars, and choose from a number of traditional and technologically innovative mementos that can be emblazoned with everything from names to personal pictures. Clients, or their veterinarians wishing to send a memento to a client, who do not wish to visit the facility personally can choose personalized items conveniently over the Internet. Since the inception of these services, the significance of the human-animal bond has become very apparent to this company through its experiences with clients that include everything from processions complete with pallbearers and caskets, to client assisted euthanasias for private cremations. Regardless of the approach chosen by clients, their closure is complete, and on a timeline generally set to satisfy themselves. As one recent client stated, “I felt I followed my pet all the way to the end and felt comforted by the way everything was handled.” While these types of services are not pursued by all pet owners, they do offer veterinarians an increasingly valuable option for satisfying clients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.610
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207