MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The novel adipokine chemerin significantly increases cholesterol uptake in human macrophages

2008· article· en· W6796670 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Tanya C. McCarthy, Luis Zúñiga, Brian A. Zabel, Eugene C. Butcher, Christopher J. Sinal

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsChemerinAdipokineMacrophageFoam cellCholesterolEndocrinologyEffluxInternal medicineMonocyteChemistryReceptorChemokineBiologyMedicineBiochemistryLipoproteinIn vitroLeptinObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atherosclerosis is the most common pathology underlying cardiovascular disease. One of the early events in atherosclerotic plaque formation is the excessive accumulation of cholesterol by macrophages leading to the development of macrophage foam cells. The novel adipokine chemerin is an endogenous ligand for CMKLR1, a G‐protein‐coupled receptor that is highly expressed on macrophage cells. Therefore, we hypothesized that chemerin may have an important role in the pathology of atherosclerosis through the modulation of macrophage function. Cholesterol uptake and efflux experiments show a significant increase in total cholesterol in human monocyte derived macrophages (MDM) treated with chemerin. Conversely chemerin treatment had no effect on cholesterol efflux in human MDM. Interestingly, the PPAR gamma ligand rosiglitazone, caused an increase in cholesterol efflux from human MDM with a corresponding decrease in the expression of CMKLR1. These data suggest that chemerin may play a role in macrophage cholesterol uptake and foam cell formation. Supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the National Institutes of Health

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesFrench-language works237,207