On weakly periodic-like rings and commutativity theorems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A ring $R$ is called periodic if, for every $x$ in $R$, there exist distinct positive integers $m$ and $n$ such that $x^m=x^n$. An element $x$ of $R$ is called potent if $x^k=x$ for some integer $k>1$. A ring $R$ is called weakly periodic if every $x$ in $R$ can be written in the form $x=a+b$ for some nilpotent element $a$ and some potent element $b$ in $R$. A ring $R$ is called weakly periodic-like if every element $x$ in $R$ which is not in the center $C$ of $R$ can be written in the form $x=a+b$, with $a$ nilpotent and $b$ potent. Some structure and commutativity theorems are established for weakly periodic-like rings $R$ satisfying certain torsion-freeness hypotheses along with conditions involving some elements being central.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it