MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W68211435 · doi:10.5206/cie-eci.v24i2.9005

A Case Study from India: Empowering Education Health and Rural Change

2012· article· en· W68211435 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dip Kapoor

Bibliographic record

VenueComparative and International Education · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPoverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesRural populationPopulationEthnologyRural areaSociologyDemographyLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Orissa, le BGKS (Bapuji Gramya Kalyan Samaj) est une organisation non politique ayant pour principaux objectifs un changement systematique de la situation sociale, un changement de la communaute et de l'education et la connaissance de la population. Suite a une epidemie de meningite et avec l'aide d'Oxfam - une organisation britannique charitable - le BGKS decida de faire prendre conscience des problemes sanitaires, d'organiser la population afin qu'elle revendique ses droits a un systeme sanitaire correspondant a ses besoins et decida de revivifier la connaissance sanitaire traditionnelle. L'education permet d'acquerir plus de pouvoir, plus d'independance, plus de democratie et plus de participation active de la population indigene

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComparative and International EducationSame topicPoverty, Education, and Child WelfareFrench-language works237,207