MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W68438161

Los límites a la redistribución entre territorios: un análisis comparado y simulaciones para el caso español

2014· article· es· W68438161 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xoaquín Fernández Leiceaga, Santiago Lago Peñas

Bibliographic record

VenueDocumentos de Trabajo FUNCAS · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Rights and Immigration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este trabajo se examina el principio de ordinalidad o no reordenacion, recogido en el nuevo Estatuto de Autonomia de Cataluna. Para ello partimos de una explicacion del funcionamiento de los sistemas de nivelacion en cuatro paises federales (Estados Unidos, Canada, Alemania y Australia), incidiendo en las diferencias del grado de respeto del principio de ordinalidad y sus consecuencias en terminos de igualdad de recursos. En la segunda parte del trabajo revisamos como y en que medida se ha incorporado en la practica ese principio de no reordenacion en Espana y mostramos algunas simulaciones que tratan de senalar cuanto habria que reducir la nivelacion interterritorial en Espana para garantizar la no reordenacion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDocumentos de Trabajo FUNCASSame topicHuman Rights and ImmigrationFrench-language works237,207