MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W68667641

The Effects of Managerial Output Control and Team Autonomy on New Product Development Speed: The Moderating Effect of Product Newness

2011· article· en· W68667641 on OpenAlex
Pilar Carbonell, Ana Isabel Rodríguez Escudero

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicInnovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutonomyNew product developmentProduct (mathematics)Control (management)BusinessProduct innovationModerationProcess managementMarketingPsychologyEconomicsSocial psychologyManagementMathematicsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the direct and combined effects of managerial output control and team autonomy on the speed of new product development (NPD). The study also explores the moderating effect of product newness on the previous relationships. By studying 247 new product projects, we found that managerial output control is positively related to NPD speed. A positive interaction effect was found between managerial output control and team autonomy on NPD speed. Specifically, the results show that when managerial output control is high, team autonomy has a positive impact on the speed of new product development. Team autonomy has no influence on new product development speed otherwise. Regarding the moderating role of product newness, results indicate that managerial output control is more positively related to the speed of low innovative products than that of high innovative products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it