MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6884462747 · doi:10.1021/ja4088264.s001

DFT Computational\nStudy of the Methanolytic Cleavage\nof DNA and RNA Phosphodiester Models Promoted by the Dinuclear Zn<sup>(II)</sup> Complex of 1,3-Bis(1,5,9-triazacyclododec-1-yl)propane

2016· article· en· W6884462747 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphodiester bondRNACatalysisDNALigand (biochemistry)Cleavage (geology)NucleotideLewis acids and bases

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A density functional\ntheory study of the cleavage of a DNA model\n[<i>p</i>-nitrophenyl methyl phosphate (<b>2</b>)]\nand two RNA models [<i>p</i>-nitrophenyl 2-hydroxypropyl\nphosphate (<b>3</b>) and phenyl 2-hydroxypropyl phosphate (<b>4</b>)] promoted by the dinuclear Zn<sup>(II)</sup> complex of\n1,3-bis­(1,5,9-triazacyclododec-1-yl)­propane formulated with a bridging\nmethoxide (<b>1a</b>) was undertaken to determine possible mechanisms\nfor the transesterification processes that are consistent with experimental\ndata. The initial substrate-bound state of <b>2</b>:<b>1a</b> or <b>3</b>:<b>1a</b> has the two phosphoryl oxygens\nbridging Zn<sup>(II)</sup><sub>1</sub> and Zn<sup>(II)</sup><sub>2</sub>. For each of <b>2</b> and <b>3</b>, four possible mechanisms\nwere investigated, three of which were consistent with the overall\nfree energy for the catalytic cleavage step for each substrate. The\ncomputations revealed various roles for the metal ions in the three\nmechanisms. These encompass concerted or stepwise processes, where\nthe two metal ions with associated alkoxy groups [Zn<sup>(II)</sup><sub>1</sub>:(<sup>−</sup>OCH<sub>3</sub>) and Zn<sup>(II)</sup><sub>1</sub>:(<sup>−</sup>O-propyl)] play the role of a direct\nnucleophile (on <b>2</b> and <b>3</b>, respectively) or\nwhere Zn<sup>(II)</sup><sub>1</sub>:(<sup>−</sup>OCH<sub>3</sub>) can act as a general base to deprotonate an attacking solvent molecule\nin the case of <b>2</b> or the attacking 2-hydroxypropyl group\nin the case of <b>3</b>. The Zn<sup>(II)</sup><sub>2</sub> ion\ncan serve as a spectator (after exerting a Lewis acid role in binding\none of the phosphates’ oxygens) or play active additional roles\nin providing direct coordination of the departing aryloxy group or\npositioning a hydrogen-bonding solvent to assist the departure of\nthe leaving group. An important finding revealed by the calculations\nis the flexibility of the ligand system that allows the Zn–Zn\ndistance to expand from ∼3.6 Å in <b>1a</b> to over\n5 Å in the transforming <b>2</b>:<b>1a</b> and <b>3</b>:<b>1a</b> complexes during the catalytic event.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicChemical Reaction MechanismsFrench-language works237,207