MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6884490872 · doi:10.1021/la903815t.s001

Nanobeads Highly Loaded with Superparamagnetic Nanoparticles Prepared by Emulsification and Seeded-Emulsion Polymerization

2016· article· en· W6884490872 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCharacterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperparamagnetismColloidThermogravimetric analysisPolymerizationNanoparticlePolymerEmulsion polymerizationSaturation (graph theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Functional superparamagnetic colloids possessing high saturation magnetization are prepared by emulsification of superparamagnetic nanoparticles (SPM NPs) and heterogeneous polymerization. The colloids consist of a core of densely packed NPs encapsulated within a thin polymer shell. The cores are made by emulsifying SPM NPs and toluene into an aqueous surfactant solution, and subsequently condensing the emulsion droplets by removal of the solvent generating clusters of SPM NPs. By tuning the emulsification condition, this approach allows for control over the size of the clusters from approximately 40 to 200 nm. The polymer shells encapsulating the clusters are made by using seeded-emulsion polymerization concepts. Control over the thickness of the shell and the incorporation of functional groups to the colloid is achieved. Characterization by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and magnetometry shows that these colloids have 66 wt % of magnetic material and saturation magnetization of 47 emu/g, confirming that this route generates colloids with a high loading of SPM NPs and high saturation magnetizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicCharacterization and Applications of Magnetic NanoparticlesFrench-language works237,207