Childcare and Children’s Development: Features of Effective Programs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A broad set of noncognitive skills, including self-control, grit, and perseverance, are increasingly recognized as critical determinants of long-term life outcomes. These “personality skills” have been shown to be as important as cognitive abilities in influencing educational attainment, labor market success, and overall well-being. Importantly, they are not immutable traits but can be shaped through well-designed interventions, particularly during childhood . Therefore, schools offer an ideal setting for fostering their development. This review examines the impact of three key school features on the development of personality. The first feature is the classroom environment, which functions as the primary social space in which children interact with both peers and teachers. Educational policies that target classroom size and peer composition contribute to the positive development of socioemotional skills. Second, teachers play an important role in shaping personality, not only through their pedagogical approaches but also through their beliefs about and attitudes toward students as well as through their own socioemotional well-being. Third, the review analyzes targeted school-based interventions that explicitly aim to support personality development. These interventions often focus on specific skill sets, including self-regulation, resilience, empowerment, and social and emotional competencies. Research on the development of personality faces key challenges, including data limitations, measurement difficulties, and a lack of standardized tools that hinders comparability across studies. Identifying the mechanisms through which school-based policies affect personality development also requires complex, costly research designs. Additionally, there is a need for more long-term studies to evaluate the impact of such policies on personality skills and broader life outcomes. Finally, effectively communicating evidence on personality skills to policymakers and the public is imperative not only to prevent misperceptions about the goals of these policies but also to foster public trust and political support needed for their long-term sustainability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".