MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6884635905 · doi:10.11575/prism/48697

HIGH-THROUGHPUT, OPTIMIZED PLATFORMS FOR 3D BIOPRINTING OF KIDNEY ORGANOIDS

2025· other· en· W6884635905 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary
Keywords3D bioprintingDecellularizationInduced pluripotent stem cellRegenerative medicineBiofabricationTissue engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three-dimensional bioprinting has emerged as a transformative technology in tissue engineering, offering promising solutions for organ regeneration, drug screening, and disease modeling. However, challenges such as labor-intensive procedures, limited scalability, and inconsistencies in bioprinted tissue quality remain significant barriers to widespread application. This thesis addresses these challenges through three interrelated studies focused on advancing bioprinting systems. The first study addressed the critical need for organ-specific bioinks tailored to support tissue-specific functions. A photocrosslinkable bioink derived from decellularized porcine kidney extracellular matrix was developed, preserving native biochemical components and demonstrating favorable rheological properties optimized for digital light processing-based stereolithography and piston drive extrusion based bioprinting. This bioink supported high cell viability, enhanced human embryonic kidney cell proliferation, and promoted tissue-specific maturation, establishing its suitability for engineering functional renal tissue constructs. The second study developed a machine learning-assisted, high-throughput bioprinting platform with optimized control of critical parameters, including bioink viscosity, nozzle size, printing time, printing pressure, and cell concentration. A custom-designed bioprinter capable of producing multiple cellular droplets simultaneously was built, generating extensive image datasets used to train predictive models. Among the machine learning algorithms evaluated, the multilayer perceptron model achieved the highest prediction accuracy for droplet volume, while the decision tree model exhibited the fastest computational performance. This integrated system significantly improved precision and efficiency, laying a foundation for scalable bioprint. Finally, the third study demonstrated the practical application of the automated kidney organoid production. A custom-modified, low-cost extrusion based three-dimensional bioprinter was utilized to fabricate kidney organoids from human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived nephron progenitor cells. These bioprinted organoids expressed key renal markers, including podocytes, tubular structures, and vascular components. Quantitative analysis of nephron-like structures further underscored the system's scalability and efficiency. Notably, the capability to produce organoids using as few as 8,000 cells highlights the platform’s suitability for high-throughput bioprinting applications. Collectively, these studies present a comprehensive framework integrating customized bioprinting platforms and developed bioinks, addressing critical challenges in the field. By significantly enhancing efficiency, scalability, and precision in organoid production, these advancements provide solutions and pave the way for impactful applications in tissue engineering and precision medicine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→