Attachment to Place: Three-Dimensional Spatial Analysis and Long-Term Land Use at the Stampede Site, DjOn-26
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two models of long-term land use, the ecological and contextual models, have been used to explain continuity and change in the patterned use of sites by hunter-gatherers. Recent excavations at the deeply stratified Stampede site (DjOn-26) have revealed remarkable continuity in the use of space throughout the past 8,000 years; however, post-depositional disturbances have resulted in the slumping and displacement of individual paleosols, posing a challenge for artefact associations and inter-paleosol comparison. This thesis will examine the spatial distribution of cultural materials and hearth assemblages from the Stampede site, located in the Cypress Hills, Alberta. Three-dimensional spatial analysis is combined with GIS to correct slumped deposits and refine archaeologically defined levels. Two-dimensional spatial analysis is then applied to investigate the patterning of materials and non-portable features in successive occupations. The results will provide an opportunity to critically evaluate long-term land use models through comparison of the nature and organization of activities during specific occupation phases at the Stampede site.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".