MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6884639676 · doi:10.11575/prism/47337

Characterizing GATA6+ cells in the kidney

2024· other· en· W6884639676 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsKidneyKidney diseaseMacrophagePopulationAcute kidney injuryInflammationRenal stem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Globally, acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) cause an estimated 13 million and 700 million cases/year, and 1.7 million and 1.2 million deaths/year, respectively. Kidney disease is the result of many different insults. Kidney injury promotes the recruitment and proliferation of different leukocyte populations, including macrophages to the kidney that play a major role in disease pathogenesis. Recruitment of resolution and reparative macrophages induce anti-inflammatory responses and promote kidney repair, but the characteristics of these cell populations are not clearly defined. GATA6+ macrophages had been reported to facilitate tissue repair following injury in organs other than the kidney. However, whether GATA6+ macrophages are resolution and repair macrophages in the kidney is not known. Using immunofluorescence imaging, flow cytometry, and nCounter transcriptome techniques, we assessed GATA6+ cells in normal and diseased kidney of mouse and human while probing common tissue macrophage markers specifically CD206+ and CD163+ as a benchmark. We showed that both CD206+ and CD163+ macrophages were detectable in normal and diseased mouse and human kidney. In mouse, both CD206+ and CD163+ macrophages were upregulated in various kidney compartments especially during CKD. Whereas in human, CD206+ and CD163+ macrophages appeared to be resident in the kidney and upregulated in diseased states. Using the same technique, significant population of GATA6+ cells were identified in mouse and human kidney particularly during CKD. GATA6+ cells were mainly localized in the tubulointerstitial area of the kidney cortex. In mouse and human kidney, the majority of GATA6+ cells did not co-express common leukocyte/macrophage markers. Conversely, in mouse and human CKD, GATA6+ cells mostly co-expressed the stromal cell marker αSMA. Using nCounter transcriptome profile of mouse samples, GATA6+ cells represented a distinct non-immune cell population that expressed genes associated with stromal cell identity, inflammation regulation, angiogenesis and collagen biosynthesis. The role of GATA6+ cells in CKD will require further exploration to unravel specific pathological and/or repair mechanisms that may lead to improved management of kidney disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→