MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6884652541 · doi:10.11575/prism/40328

The Economic Impact of Infectious Bronchitis on the Canadian Poultry Industry

2022· other· en· W6884652541 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoultry farmingEconomic impact analysisInfectious bronchitis virusVaccinationOutbreakFlockAvian infectious bronchitisBiosecurityRevenue

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infectious bronchitis is a common, highly contagious, acute, and economically important viral disease of chickens caused by infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), a gammacoronavirus. It affects the respiratory system, reproductive organs, and kidneys. Morbidity is 100%, and mortality can go well up to 30%, while egg production drops by up to 50% or more depending upon secondary infection by bacterial pathogens. Emerging IBV variants have led to outbreaks in vaccinated flocks due to a lack of cross-protective immunity, which represents a concern for producers. It is imperative that we assess the economic impact of IBV on the Canadian poultry industry to make important decisions on control and mitigation. I hypothesized that vaccination to prevent infectious bronchitis (IB) in poultry layers would have net positive economic benefits for Canadian poultry producers. A multiple scenario framework with Monte Carlo simulation and benefit-cost analysis was applied. The economic impact of IB on layer farms in Canada was examined by setting up models of Canadian layer poultry farms using data from Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, scientific papers, the internet, and industry sources to perform simulations for various revenue classes across a range of IBV infection scenarios while considering possible control and prevention options. The results show that the impact of IB outbreaks on Canadian poultry industry is estimated to be around 207 billion CAD annually. The high benefit-cost ratios (5-9) from adopting IB vaccines suggest that vaccination as a preventive strategy would be highly cost effective. The study demonstrated the value of vaccination as a preventive or mitigation strategy against potential losses due to IBV. Understanding the extent of economic losses IB outbreaks cause to layer producers would inform the development of timely and cost-effective disease control and preventive measures in order to minimize the impact of IB on egg and chicken production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.376

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)French-language works237,207