MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6884662715 · doi:10.11583/dtu.21316608.v3

Ready-To-Train AI4Arctic Sea Ice Challenge Dataset

2023· dataset· en· W6884662715 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceOpen waterSynthetic aperture radarSea ice concentrationSea ice thicknessEarth observation satelliteSatelliteData setArctic ice pack

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The AI4Arctic Sea Ice Challenge Datasets are produced for the AI4EO sea ice competition initiated by the European Space Agency (ESA) ɸ-lab. The purpose of the competition is to develop deep learning models to automatically produce sea ice charts including sea ice concentration, stage-of-development and floe size (form) information. The training datasets contain Sentinel-1 active microwave Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data and corresponding passive MicroWave Radiometer (MWR) data from the AMSR2 satellite sensor. While SAR data has ambiguities between open water and sea ice, it has a high spatial resolution, whereas MWR data has good contrast between open water and ice. However, the coarse resolution of the AMSR2 MWR observations introduces a new set of obstacles, e.g. land spill-over, which can lead to erroneous sea ice predictions along the coastline adjacent to open water. Label data in the challenge datasets are ice charts, that have been produced by the Greenland ice service at the Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI) and the Canadian Ice Service (CIS) for the safety of navigation. The challenge datasets also contain other auxiliary data such as the distance to land and numerical weather prediction model data. The scenes are from the time period from January 8 2018 to December 21 2021. Two versions of the dataset exist, the '<em>raw'</em> and '<em>ready-to-train'-</em>versions with corresponding test datasets<em>. </em>The datasets each consist of the same 512 training and 20 test (without label data) scenes. The ‘<em>ready-to-train’</em>-version has been further prepared for model training, such as downsampled data from 40 to 80 m pixel spacing, standard scaled, converted ice charts (sea ice concentration, stage of development and floe size), removal of nan values, mask alignment etc. This is the Ready-To-Train version. Further details are described in the common manual that is published together with the datasets; “AI4Arctic_challenge-dataset-manual”. Code with a get-started toolkit for the '<em>ready-to-train</em>' dataset: https://github.com/astokholm/AI4ArcticSeaIceChallenge A quick challenge video overview of the challenge is available at: https://youtu.be/iuXIeLPyKfg This item is part of the Collection https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.c.6244065 Version 2 has 20 additional scenes and has been reprocessed to accommodate the updated mean and STandard Deviation (std). Furthermore, SOD and FLOE variables have been slightly altered from version 1, as the dominant ice code threshold was incorrectly set to 70% and 50%, respectively, instead of the 65%, which was otherwise specified in the dataset manual. Version 3 removes a scene with a faulty ice chart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3110.971

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.173
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareFrench-language works237,207