MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6884777012 · doi:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.1859

Assisted suicide is a critical problem in psychiatry

2023· article· en· W6884777012 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAssisted suicideDignityBioethicsCommissionLegislationRight to dieExistentialismWorryIntervention (counseling)Ethical issues

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Active euthanasia is currently permitted in Netherlands, Belgium, Colombia, Luxembourg, Canada, Australia and India. Assisted suicide is allowed in Switzerland, Germany, South Korea, Japan, as well as in the states of Washington, Oregon, Colorado, Hawaii, Vermont, Montana, California of the USA. The right to die is considered to be a basic human right. In 2018, 2,357 euthanasia procedures were carried out in Belgium, most of them for the elderly. Factors that contribute to the decision to euthanize older people are: existential crisis; loss of autonomy, dignity and control; worry about future loss of autonomy, dignity, and control; lack of understanding of the processes of dying; concerns about medical intervention and treatment at the end of life; increasing disunity between generations; decline of people’s spiritual culture and religious faith. In the Netherlands, euthanasia is allowed from the age of 12, sometimes for infants up to two years old. Some countries allow assisted suicide of the mentally ill. The possibility of suicide for people «who are tired of life» is discussed. OBJECTIVES: Investigation of the ethical aspects of the role of a psychiatrist in the commission of assisted suicide METHODS: In order to study ethical aspects of the role of a psychiatrist in assisted suicide, the materials of the Department of bioethics of UNESCO and the positions of the legislation of a number of countries were studied. RESULTS: The decision about euthanasia is taken by a commission of 3 doctors, one of whom is a psychiatrist. According to psychiatrists, the desire to die in a patient with a mental disorder should be considered the same as the desire of a patient with cancer. The role of psychiatrists in euthanasia and assisted suicide is reversed. These are: the study of assisted suicides, assistance in their implementation and popularization, determination of legal capacity to permit suicide, creation of a psychotherapeutic space and providing psychological assistance to patients in the process of dying, writing of a prescription for a lethal drug, consulting patients and their families. CONCLUSIONS: The role of psychiatrists in Russia is to prevent suicides and treat patients with suicidal tendencies. Assistance by a psychiatrist in the suicide is a critical problem in psychiatry. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST: None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed CentralSame topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesFrench-language works237,207