MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6884861128 · doi:10.13096/rfre.v8n2.217

Qu’est-ce que le professionnalisme en ergothérapie ? Étude des représentations d’étudiants et de superviseurs de stagiaires francophones du Québec

2022· article· fr· W6884861128 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLe dépôt institutionnel (Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières) · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Therapy Practice and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationFrenchContext (archaeology)Ethnography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le professionnalisme est une compétence-clé pour les ergothérapeutes, mais des enjeux d’ambiguïté concernant sa définition ont été soulevés par le passé. Une récente étude a permis de proposer une définition contemporaine du professionnalisme en ergothérapie. Or, cette définition est générique et ne tient pas compte des spécificités de la population particulière que sont les étudiants en ergothérapie. Le but de cette étude était d’explorer les représentations sociales qu’ont du professionnalisme des étudiants et des superviseurs de stagiaires en ergothérapie dans le contexte universitaire francophone québécois. Selon un devis descriptif interprétatif, des groupes de discussion ont été menés auprès de 16 étudiants universitaires et des entrevues individuelles ont été conduites avec 16 superviseurs de stagiaires. Les données qualitatives recueillies ont été traitées à l’aide d’une stratégie d’analyse thématique. Il s’agissait de déterminer les antécédents (p. ex. : parcours éducatif), attributs (p. ex. : attitude de juste confiance en soi ou comportement consistant à considérer tous les membres de l’équipe de façon égalitaire) et conséquents (p. ex. : identité professionnelle) du professionnalisme en ergothérapie qui soient spécifiques à la population des étudiants et des superviseurs francophones en ergothérapie au Québec. Il ressort des résultats que le professionnalisme s’inscrit dans un paradigme développemental complexe, que les valeurs propres à la profession sont peu présentes dans les représentations sociales des étudiants et superviseurs de stagiaires rencontrés et que l’organisation du travail peut être une menace pour le professionnalisme en ergothérapie. Enfin, cette étude offre des leviers sur lesquels agir pour faciliter et bonifier l’enseignement et le développement du professionnalisme, notamment en suggérant de miser sur les activités réflexives (p. ex. : portfolio) et d’échange (p. ex. : communauté de pratique) et de bonifier la formation en éthique que reçoivent les étudiants. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Professionalism is a key competency for occupational therapists, but issues of ambiguity regarding its definition have arisen in the past. A recent study proposed a contemporary definition of professionalism in occupational therapy. However, this definition is generic and does not consider the specifics of the singular population of occupational therapy students. The purpose of this study was to explore the social representations of professionalism of students and supervisors of occupational therapy interns in the francophone university context in Quebec. According to an interpretative descriptive research design, focus groups were conducted with 16 university students and individual interviews were conducted with 16 supervisors of interns. The qualitative data collected was processed using a thematic analysis strategy. Results suggest antecedents (e.g.: academic background), attributes (e.g.: attitude of fair self-confidence or behavior of considering all team members equally) and consequences (e.g.: professional identity) of professionalism in occupational therapy that are unique to the population of French-speaking occupational therapy students and intern supervisors in Quebec. The interpretation of the results suggests that professionalism is part of a complex developmental paradigm, that the values specific to the profession are not very present in the social representations of the students and intern supervisors we met, and that the work organization may be a threat to professionalism in occupational therapy. Finally, this study offers levers to facilitate and improve the teaching and development of professionalism, notably by suggesting that reflective activities (e.g.: portfolios), exchange activities (e.g.: community of practice) and ethics training for students be enhanced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0110.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLe dépôt institutionnel (Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières)Same topicOccupational Therapy Practice and ResearchFrench-language works237,207