MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6885049951 · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.17770.70089

Testing the Use of Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility (AMS) in Determining Genetic Origins of Paleoproterozoic Diamictites

2023· article· en· W6885049951 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWM Digital Commons (University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetic susceptibilityAnisotropyMagnetic anisotropyDemagnetizing fieldRock magnetism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Huronian Supergroup (2.4-2.1 Ga) in Ontario, Canada is widely accepted as an important stratigraphic interval for interpreting Paleoproterozoic climate. This is because it contains some of the oldest glaciogenic rocks on the planet. However, massive and poorly-stratified diamictites in the Gowganda Formation of the Huronian Supergroup have varying depositional interpretations among sedimentologists (subglacial, rainout, sediment gravity flow etc.). Diamictites can occur from a variety of processes and, therefore, proper depositional interpretation is essential for unraveling detailed environmental conditions at the time of deposition. Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) looks at the orientation of magnetic particles within a rock and coupled with sedimentary investigation, can help interpret depositional processes. Rock magnetic data show that magnetism is carried by multi-vortex (titano)magnetite in fine-grained facies and includes the addition of a higher- coercivity contribution (potentially diagenetic goethite) in some sandstone facies. Most magnetic fabrics iii are oblate in shape and oriented transverse to flow, although vertical fabrics were found in sites that exhibited substantial deformation or dewatering. Results and observations from this project suggest that Gowganda sedimentation was dominated by sediment gravity flows, deposited on a marine post-glacial slope with a southwestern transport direction. Interpretation of depositional processes through a combination of AMS and sedimentologic observation provide a more comprehensive understanding of the environmental conditions controlling deposition, and in this case, painting a more elaborate picture of Paleoproterozoic climate transitions. In contrast with subglacially derived diamictites, which are deposited directly under glacial ice, those produced by sediment gravity flows suggest a more glacially distal to non- glacial environment. The presence of bedded diamictites, water escape structures, quarter structures around clasts, a general lack of shear horizons and striated/faceted clasts as well as an abundance of flow-transvers magnetic fabrics observed in most Gowganda facies suggest this more distal environment. However, subglacial deformation and deposition cannot be entirely ruled out for one oriented and striated boulder bed horizon producing flow-aligned magnetic fabrics; both characteristics of subglacial processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWM Digital Commons (University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee)Same topicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesFrench-language works237,207