Bibliographic record
Abstract
a<p>Catholic populations by country from <a href="http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/country/sc1.html" target="_blank">http://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/country/sc1.html</a><a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001132#pntd.0001132-Cheney1" target="_blank">[4]</a>.</p>b<p>Only the top 31 Catholic countries with more than 5 million Catholics and\n countries in which at least 50% of the population is Catholic are\n included (as well as Canada and Uganda, each with more than 40%\n Catholic population), which excludes India, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria,\n and Vietnam.</p>c<p>From <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001132#pntd.0001132-Bethony1" target="_blank">[6]</a>, <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001132#pntd.0001132-deSilva1" target="_blank">[7]</a>.</p>d<p>From <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001132#pntd.0001132-Steinmann1" target="_blank">[8]</a>, <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001132#pntd.0001132-Chitsulo1" target="_blank">[9]</a>.</p>e<p>From <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001132#pntd.0001132-Global1" target="_blank">[10]</a>, <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001132#pntd.0001132-African1" target="_blank">[11]</a>.</p>f<p>Chagas disease is found in every South American and Central American\n country listed <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001132#pntd.0001132-Hotez4" target="_blank">[5]</a>.</p>g<p>From <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001132#pntd.0001132-US1" target="_blank">[31]</a>.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.329 | 0.580 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".