An “Imperial undertaking” : Harry T. Logan, Fairbridge Farm Schools, and the Department of Classics at the University of British Columbia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Professor Harry Tremaine Logan is a significant figure in the University of British Columbia’s history. Logan was a classicist trained at McGill and Oxford and later became principal of the Prince of Wales Fairbridge Farm School on Vancouver Island. This school participated in child migration schemes, taking 329 British children from their parents or orphanages between 1934 and 1951. Survivors remember this school as a place where they suffered emotional, physical, and sexual abuse. In this thesis, I consider how Logan became an agent of empire by looking at his education and the relationship between classics, colonialism, and empire, and by analyzing the words of survivors from the Prince of Wales Fairbridge Farm School. To do so, I consider how Logan understood empire, how he formed this understanding through his training in classics, the relationship between classics and empire, and demonstrate how Logan participated in imperialism at Fairbridge. I use archival evidence from the UBC archives (especially letters and exams taken and given by Logan), survivor testimonies, and investigatory findings on child migration, to contextualize how Logan came to hold the power he did and how he understood his role in contemporary imperialism in B.C. Logan was celebrated by UBC until recently but created an unsafe environment for children at Fairbridge. He was imagined for years as a benevolent philanthropist, but peeling back the layers of his work, the harm he caused was exposed. He studied Classics, understanding this work as setting the foundations for understanding imperialism in his day. The Fairbridge Farm School system provided the means through which Logan could enact imperialism and realize the ideals of ancient world Logan had studied. As a classical scholar who engaged with questions of power, domination, and colonization, the work he did at Fairbridge fit well within this scheme. He looked to ancient Greece and Rome to legitimize the work he undertook. Logan’s troubling legacy at UBC and his interpretation and application of Classics should inspire contemporary classicists to change the field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.040 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".