MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6886074721 · doi:10.14288/1.0370813

Anno Tricesimo Victoria Regina. No. 31. An Ordinance respecting Practitioners in Medicine and Surgery. [2nd April, 1867.] Whereas it is expedient that persons requiring Medical Aid should be enabled to distinguish qualified from unqualified practitioners; Be it enacted by the Governor of British Columbia, with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council thereof, as follows: ...

2018· article· en· W6886074721 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistory of Medical Practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Medical practiceAlternative medicinePublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

{L.S.} [COAT OF ARMS] BRITISH COLUMBIA. ANNO TRICESIMO VICTORIA REGINA. NO. 31. AN ORDINANCE RESPECTING PRACTITIONERS IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY. [2ND APRIL, 1867]. New Westminster: Printed at the Government Printing Office [1867].<br><br>Sets out the rules and qualifications for surgeons operating in the Colony.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen CollectionsSame topicHistory of Medical PracticeFrench-language works237,207