Bibliographic record
Abstract
nterest to JEPE's first and second editions and incentives of some members in Editorial Board have been encouraging to publish new journals.Therefore, KSP Journals which is a group with economics centered was born.These new journals are designed as TER, JEST and JSAS which are using JEPE's restructure, so that JEPE's principles and scientific targets are generalized for these journals.Therefore, it has been decided to go on publishing with these 4 journals in which the same principles and targets are generalized.Especially JEST and JSAS are designed as accepting the articles in the subjects of management, public administration, international relations, finance, accounting and even sociology addition to economics although KSP Journals are a group with economics centered.The subjects of the articles that the journals can accept are specified in the website and set the lines for each journal.The structure of and policies specified by JEPE as leading journal of KSP Journals Group, are preserved for other journals and started being implemented.Additinally, especially the website is being improved and developed recurrently.Besides, the page design which was developed for JEPE, is improved much more and now it is in a point that will not need to change for a long time.As announced before, JEPE's second edition was published in 18th day of Quarter and third edition will be published in 18 March.Therefore the principle of "publishing in the 18th day in the Quarter" is specified as a standard publishing date principle for all other KSP Journals.Moreover, this is effective for also special issues.In this edition, totally 11 articles from Switzerland, Bulgaria, Portugal, Nigeria, USA (2), United Kingdom, Malaysia, Mexico, Japan, and Turkey are published after Editorial and Arbitrator evaluation processes.This publishing diversity is a proof of achieving the principle of "exhibiting different ideas in order to enhance the scientific knowledge" in addition to the JEPE's qualification of "an international journal".Additionally, 7 articles were rejected as finding them not suitable to be published after Editorial and Arbitrary Evaluation Processes.Thus, the ratio of accepting the articles in JEPE's second edition is 58%.In addition to these articles, Turkish translations of three articles (Abdulkadirolu & Snmez (2003); Barro (2001) and Bonefeld (1992)) which are considered as a classic in economics field were taken place in the edition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.056 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.310 | 0.309 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".