MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6886157126 · doi:10.14989/pnggw_13_3

Reimagining Refugee Encounters in The Displaced

2021· article· en· W6886157126 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueKyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman Colonialism and Identity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeeScholarshipAgency (philosophy)Forced migrationPoliticsCredibilitySubaltern

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In refugee discourses, though much has been discussed at the levels of humanitarianism, law, geopolitics and sociology, refugee voices (interviews, testimonies, memoirs, etc.) as well as scholarship on them are largely missing.1While historian Dan Stone calls for a more active presence of refugees in these studies, instead of taking refugees as 'a pre-existing category' in relation to present-day concerns (103), Nando Sigona elucidates the public confines imposed on refugees in asserting their subjectivities with respect to credibility (that they are widely deemed 'bogus' necessitates careful assessment and Western experts' corroboration) and social expectation of 'pure' victimhood, echoing Spivak's question on the potency of the subaltern voices.Furthermore, Sigona offers a literature review of how refugees have been (mis)represented in a fetishized (dehistoricized and depoliticized) and pathologized (dependent and vulnerable) manner in Western mass media, so as to deny their political agency and conceal the real causes of their forced migration, which often relate to wars waged by the Western countries.The ways in which these portrayals of refugees are ideologically constructed and the intended effects will be examined later.In addition, the heterogeneity within the refugee subjects -'there are a thousand multifarious refugee experiences' (Soguk 4) -which might lead to the (self-)questioning of the authenticity or representativeness of refugee stories, and ethical risks involved in appropriating refugee positions, pertaining to both nonfictional/memorial and fictional writings, could inhibit the creative force informed by refugee experiences, in intervening in 'the international order of things' (Malkki).1 For example, in The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies (2014), 'literature' or memory studies is not among the nine major approaches (history, law, political theory, anthropology, etc.) outlined in the contents.Amidst 53 chapters, only chapter 29 "The Politics of Refugee Voices" is partially relevant.This paper aims to address the aforementioned problematics by showcasing the plurality and diversity of refugee reality in The Displaced: Refugee Writers on Refugee Lives (2018), an edited collection by Viet Thanh Nguyen, consisting of 17 short memoirs narrated by refugee writers worldwide, based on their own refugee experiences.2 The multiplicity of refugee voices is achieved in this book without relativizing or prioritizing any specific experience, which demonstrates what Michael Rothberg terms a 'multidirectional memory', drawing on connections from colonial and Holocaust discourses, which entails 'cross-referencing', 'borrowing', and productive 'interaction of different collective memories' (3).Although refugee writers in Displaced each tell their own story, who also speak to a larger group that embark on the same routes (Afghanistan to America, Soviet Union to Canada, Ethiopia to Germany, etc.), their experiences are in dialogues and solidarity, while they also recognize the particular encounters different groups and individuals are subjected to, which will be further substantiated in this paper.Individually and collectively, their writings disrupt and challenge the normative script of refugee imagination, which will be analyzed in arguing for the potential transformative power of memoirs and story-telling in refugee studies.Before delving into the text, this paper will first critically scrutinize the very notion of refugee authorship and its stakes.In response to the possibility of subaltern agency, Spivak suggests that 'the subaltern cannot speak' in the sense that she is unable to be heard; one ceases to be subaltern in making oneself heard (The Spivak Reader 292; 5-6).3 In contrast, Nguyen prefaces Displaced with the awareness of this seeming contradiction: 'I was once a refugee4 , although no one would mistake me for being a refugee now…I insist on being called a refugee…It would be so much easier to call myself an immigrant, to pass myself off as belonging to a category of migratory humanity that is less controversial, less demanding, and less threatening than the refugee' (7).His insistence on keeping the refugee identity complicates Spivak's claim through proposing 2 Except in 'God's Fate', Alexksandar Hermon tells the story of one of his fellow Bosnian refugees Kemal Frašto.3 Gramsci is referenced as an organic intellectual emerged from a subaltern position and speaks for them, whose status as a subaltern would be changed utterly (6). 4 Nguyen fled from Vietnam to America at the age of four.Now he is a Pulitzer-winning author and Professor at USC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0280.044
Scholarly communication0.0240.021
Open science0.0030.024
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University)Same topicGerman Colonialism and Identity StudiesFrench-language works237,207