MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6886163964 · doi:10.14943/j.highedu.19.53

学期制の現状と移行の課題 : 4学期制研究会報告

2012· other· en· W6886163964 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (Hokkaido University) · 2012
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)School systemPre schoolHigher educationStudy abroadTerm (time)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most Japanese universities run under the semester system. Some of them, and many other universities in other countries, employ trimester and quarter systems. In this study we collected data about school terms from universities in Japan, Canada, the U.S.A. and England. As the next step, we made models of students in science and literature courses. Then we changed the school term from semesters to trimesters and quarters. In this context, we studied the circumstances for students who wanted to go abroad for a short period. If a student is absent for one quarter to go to abroad, it may be diffi cult to obtain a full year’s credits in the remaining three quarters. This demonstrates the importance of not only the school system but also the total supporting system, including credit transfer for students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers (Hokkaido University)French-language works237,207