A qualcuno (non) piace caldo. Il caso KlimaSeniorinnen c. Svizzera avanti alla Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo (per non tacer degli altri)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il caso KlimaSeniorinnen c. Svizzera (in materia di climate change) è stato di recente discusso avanti alla Grande Camera della Corte Edu. Tale caso, in estrema sintesi, vede una associazione di donne anziane lamentare la violazione del diritto alla vita e alla salute da parte dello Stato svizzero, inadempiente nel ridurre le emissioni di CO2 che causano l’innalzamento delle temperature, esponendo così a maggiori rischi di morte le persone anziane. Quello appena descritto però, benché particolarmente interessante, non è certo un caso isolato. La Corte europea, fin qui abbastanza cauta, si trova a dover dare una risposta ad una serie di questioni importanti che potrebbero cambiare il suo ruolo in ambito europeo. Il presente contributo, partendo proprio dal caso KlimaSeniorinnen si propone di offrire una overview del contenzioso climatico avanti alla Corte edu, evidenziandone i principali nodi problematici.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".