Bibliographic record
Abstract
A dataset containing 422024 species occurrences available in GBIF matching the query: { "and" : [ "TaxonKey is one of (Elymus scribneri (Vasey) M.E.Jones, Enhydra lutris (Linnaeus, 1758), Entosphenus macrostomus (Beamish, 1982), Epargyreus clarus californicus MacNeill, 1975, Epioblasma rangiana (I.Lea, 1838), Epioblasma triquetra (Rafinesque, 1820), Erastria coloraria (Fabricius, 1798), Erigenia bulbosa (Michx.) Nutt., Erimyzon sucetta (Lacepède, 1803), Eriogonum pyrolifolium Hook. ex A.E.Murray, Erynnis martialis (Scudder, 1869), Erysimum angustatum Rydb., Eubalaena japonica (Lacépède, 1818), Euchemotrema leaii (A.Binney, 1840), Eucosma sableana Wright & Gilligan, 2015, Eumenes bollii Cresson, 1872, Euodynerus castigatus (de Saussure, 1853), Euodynerus crypticus (Say, 1823), Euodynerus exoglyphus (Bohart, 1939), Euodynerus hidalgo (de Saussure, 1857), Euodynerus megaera (Lepeletier, 1841), Euodynerus schwarzi (Krombein, 1962), Euodynerus scudderi (Cameron, 1908), Euonymus occidentalis Nutt. ex Torr., Euphorbia geyeri Engelm. & A.Gray, Euphorbia geyeri var. geyeri, Euphorbia serpens Kunth, Euphorbia spathulata Lam., Euphrasia vinacea P.D.Sell & Yeo, Euphydryas anicia bernadetta Leussler, 1920, Eupithecia bowmani Cassino & Swett, 1923, Eurhinosea flavaria Packard, 1873, Eurybia schreberi (Nees) Nees, Eutrochium dubium (Willd. ex Poir.) E.E.Lamont, Euxoa bicollaris Grote, 1878, Euxoa extranea Smith, Euxoa intermontana Lafontaine, 1975, Feltia troubridgei Lafontaine, 2004, Festuca prolifera var. lasiolepis Fernald, Festuca saximontana var. robertsiana Pavlick, Fimbristylis puberula (Michx.) Vahl, Fimbristylis puberula var. puberula, Fisherola nuttallii (Haldeman, 1841), Fraxinus americana L., Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marshall, Gadus morhua Linnaeus, 1758, Galeorhinus galeus (Linnaeus, 1758), Galium L., Galium concinnum Torr. & A.Gray, Gasterosteus Linnaeus, 1758, Gentiana puberulenta J.S.Pringle, Gentianella quinquefolia (L.) Small, Gentianella quinquefolia subsp. occidentalis (A.Gray) J.M.Gillett, Gentianella quinquefolia subsp. quinquefolia, Gentianopsis detonsa subsp. nesophila (Holm) J.S.Pringle, Geum peckii Pursh, Gilia tenerrima A.Gray, Gleditsia triacanthos L., Gonidea angulata (I.Lea, 1838), Gratiola quartermaniae D.Estes, Gymnocolea inflata subsp. acutiloba (Schiffn.) R.M.Schust. & Damsh. ex L.Söderstr. & Váňa, Hemileuca lucina H.Edwards, 1887, Henlea yukonensis Tynen & Coates, 1991, Herbertus tenuis A.Evans, Hesperia pahaska pahaska, Hetaerina titia (Drury, 1773), Heuchera americana L., Heuchera americana var. americana, Hieracium venosum L., Hippoglossoides platessoides (Fabricius, 1780), Homorthodes carneola McDunnough, 1943, Hybognathus argyritis Girard, 1856, Hybognathus placitus Girard, 1856, Hydrelia terraenovae Krogerus, 1954, Hydriomena expurgata Barnes & McDunnough, 1918, Hydriomena tuolumne Barnes & McDunnough, 1917, Hylogomphus viridifrons (Hine, 1901), Hypericum prolificum L., Hypericum sphaerocarpum Michx., Ipimorpha viridipallida Barnes & McDunnough, 1916, Iris prismatica Pursh, Isurus oxyrinchus Rafinesque, 1810, Juga hemphilli (J.Henderson, 1935), Juncus anthelatus (Wiegand) R.E.Brooks, Juncus brachycarpus Engelm., Juncus hemiendytus F.J.Herm., Juncus hemiendytus var. hemiendytus, Koeleria asiatica Domin, Krigia virginica (L.) Willd., Lacinipolia stenotis Hampson, 1905, Lactuca floridana (L.) Gaertn., Ladislavella catascopium (Say, 1817), Ladislavella woodruffi (F.C.Baker, 1901), Lamna nasus (Bonnaterre, 1788), Lampsilis cariosa (Say, 1817), Lampsilis fasciola Rafinesque, 1820, Lasionycta frigida Crabo & Lafontaine, 2009, Lasionycta gelida Crabo & Lafontaine, 2009, Lasionycta haida Crabo & Lafontaine, 2009, Lasionycta lagganata Barnes & Benjamin, 1924)", "HasGeospatialIssue is false", "HasCoordinate is true", "OccurrenceStatus is Present", { "not" : { "BasisOfRecord" : [ "is one of (Fossil)" ] } }, "Country is Canada", { "or" : [ "CoordinateUncertaintyInMeters is less than 32000", "CoordinateUncertaintyInMeters is null" ] } ] } The dataset includes 422024 records from 240 constituent datasets; see https://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/download/0032069-250426092105405/datasets/export for details. Data from some individual datasets included in this download may be licensed under less restrictive terms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.294 | 0.416 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".